Minnesota’s Beaver Meat Ban Raises Eyebrows and Questions
In an unexpected twist in Minnesota’s wildlife regulations, the state recently enacted a law prohibiting the consumption of beavers trapped for nuisance purposes, sparking curiosity and frustration among trappers and lawmakers alike.
Known for its resourceful trappers and natural enthusiasts, Minnesota now faces confusion over why a nuisance-trapped beaver—often a source of fur and even food—can’t be eaten if legally trapped for property protection.
Yet, licensed trappers can still hunt beavers for food, leaving the regulation tangled in debate.
The Law That Left Lawmakers Scratching Their Heads
The new provision slipped into Minnesota’s recent environmental bill, banning the consumption of beavers specifically trapped for nuisance reasons.
On the Senate floor, this regulation stirred murmurs and even laughter. Senator Steve Green, a known outdoors advocate, voiced concerns, saying, “I think it’s a little problematic that we are making it a crime.”
Interestingly, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) officials and local health authorities were caught by surprise.
Maj. Scott Staples of the DNR, himself a seasoned trapper, shared that no clear reason for the regulation has surfaced. “If we came across this, we’ll take appropriate enforcement action,” he commented, hinting that while the law exists, it lacks a clear rationale.
Health department spokesperson Amy Barrett noted that health officials weren’t consulted before the ban was introduced.
Although beaver meat carries a slight risk of tularemia—bacteria that could harm humans if not cooked thoroughly—proper cooking minimizes this concern. Most beaver meat fans, familiar with wild game, know how to prepare the meat safely.
Lawmakers, Trappers, and the Questionable Ban
Senator Nathan Wesenberg expressed open skepticism toward the ban, calling it “ridiculous” during legislative discussions.
“I eat beaver. It’s fine,” he added, with the comment later making its rounds on social media. The regulation remains perplexing for local trappers, including Minnesota Trappers Association VP Bert Highland, who, when reached for comment, admitted he wasn’t even aware of the law.
The law also appears to lack documentation on its origins. Minnesota’s Legislative Reference Library searched for clues, but, as librarian Molly Niehls reported, “There’s no clear-cut account of who introduced it.”
The beaver ban leaves many Minnesotans wondering whether this seemingly arbitrary law has more to it than meets the eye—or whether it’s just another quirky addition to Minnesota’s list of lesser-known rules.
For now, the mystery gnaws away, much like a beaver chomping through Minnesota’s wetlands, leaving everyone asking why.
For more on unusual meat regulations and the cultural debates surrounding wild game, visit our homepage.
