Heated Courtroom Clash Over Alleged Beef Jerky Theft

In a tense court hearing on Thursday, attorneys clashed over allegations of beef jerky theft that could impact the bond status of Kesean Stinson, who faces charges of aggravated assault.

Although Stinson was absent, emotions ran high in the Pennington County courthouse.

Allegations Ignite Tensions

Stinson, currently out on bond, is accused of wielding a box cutter in a May incident at a Rapid City Walmart. However, a new accusation of beef jerky theft from a Common Cents gas station on July 31 brought his bond into question.

Prosecutors argued that such allegations warrant bond revocation, while Stinson’s attorney pushed back, saying the claim was both sudden and unsubstantiated.

“This was the first time I have heard of this allegation,” the defense attorney stated, her voice raised. Judge Matt Brown confirmed that he, too, was unaware of the theft claim until the hearing.

Courtroom Argument Sparks Laughter

The prosecution countered that the theft allegation alone justified revoking the bond, adding that Stinson’s actions indicated a disregard for the law.

The defense fired back, stating that the prosecution was attempting to jail Stinson for “trying to feed his children.”

This led to a pointed response: “How do you know he was trying to feed his children?” the prosecutor asked, prompting laughter from others awaiting their cases.

Judge Decides Against Revocation

Judge Brown calmed the rising tensions and reminded both sides to address the issues civilly. Ultimately, he ruled against revoking Stinson’s bond but acknowledged the prosecution’s concerns.

The case will proceed with a motion hearing on December 19, ensuring further scrutiny of the allegations.

Want to explore more intriguing stories involving meat and law? Visit our homepage for detailed articles and updates.